collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WATV court decision.  (Read 2066 times)

Offline Naches Sportsman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 2784
  • Location: Idaho
WATV court decision.
« on: March 20, 2016, 05:51:02 PM »
Frustrating to all the guys and gals that are responsible atv'ers. I know I will continue to wave and act like I didn't see you. :bash:

Friggen tree hugging liberals. Just imagine everything the f.s. could get done without those tree hugging groups.

http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/outdoors/2016/mar/18/forest-service-ok-watvs-blocked-must-be-revisited-court-says/

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2016, 06:20:06 PM »
Potential potential potential...........thats all thats required to make something bad. 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2016, 06:33:21 PM »
I still can't figure why ATV/ORV vehicles are the scapegoat for ALL greenies to use ? I see more damage from jeeps/4x4 trucks, motorcycles, bulldozers, logging equipment, neglected FOREST SERVICE lands etc. I see LESS to no damage from ATV/ORV vehicles where I live than any other mobile units. It's total and 110% bullcrap why these courts rule in favor of the, enviro terrorist groups....

We have around 5-10 people in this county who denies 7200 people access to OUR LANDS....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline timberfaller

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 4385
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2016, 09:06:14 PM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:
The only good tree, is a stump!

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: WATV court decision.
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 07:40:45 AM »
"Prior to the lawsuit, the Forest Service said it could not commit any additional funding or personnel for monitoring, enforcement, or restoration of damaged areas if riders travel off-road.  “We’re concerned about agency capacity to deal with illegal and harmful off-road riding.  We need law enforcement’s presence out on the land, but the Forest Service is already stretched thin,” said ALPS president Karl Forsgaard."

The very first meeting I went to some 10 years ago, the above "excuse" was given!!

Don't forget, the USFS employee's Union is stacked with eco-freaks and politicians love getting paid for their vote!

The USFS wouldn't be "stretched" thin if they would FIRE most of upper management(plus get back to logging)!  Its called "Redundancy"  Portland would rather hire 10 paper pushers over ONE hard working, physical labor person out where NEEDED!  :yike:





So very damned true.....
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

More than one shotgun? by FlyFish360
[Today at 07:55:37 AM]


Drew Pogue Quality by jstone
[Today at 07:35:57 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by bigboy
[Today at 07:31:48 AM]


New Decoys by Shannon
[Today at 07:30:45 AM]


CB Radio Hints and Tips, Installing guidance. by Rob
[Today at 06:54:43 AM]


As He Lay by redi
[Today at 12:38:27 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 11:53:36 PM]


North Idaho 2025 Rifle Bull by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 11:47:41 PM]


Two stories for you (no deer were harmed in the making) by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:12:34 PM]


Willipa Hills Antlerless tag by dreadi
[Yesterday at 10:47:10 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Griiz
[Yesterday at 08:35:32 PM]


seeking recommendation for women's raingear by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 08:18:38 PM]


Where to find hunting mentors/etc in western wa (archery) by paninilord
[Yesterday at 08:15:22 PM]


Animal sounds at Game Commission Meeting, Wow by dreadi
[Yesterday at 07:53:29 PM]


Where to go - Coyotes by th3rug25
[Yesterday at 07:19:26 PM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by dblungshot
[Yesterday at 07:15:03 PM]


Last Minute Light by Brute
[Yesterday at 07:07:42 PM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 05:08:47 PM]


Going to try my hand at calling. by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 04:10:08 PM]


CCW thanks everyone who showed up to lynwood WDFW commission meeting by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 03:30:16 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal